↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement – a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement – a qualitative study
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s133417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arvid Birkeland, Hanne Tuntland, Oddvar Førland, Frode Fadnes Jakobsen, Eva Langeland

Abstract

In-depth knowledge regarding interdisciplinary collaboration, a key feature in reablement, is scarce. To elucidate how the interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement worked in a Norwegian context. Seven focus group interviews were conducted with 33 health care providers working in interdisciplinary reablement teams in seven municipalities across the country. The focus group interviews were transcribed and an hermeneutical analysis was conducted. The analysis resulted in four main themes: "participant's own goals as a common interdisciplinary platform", "a positive professional community", "learning from each other's skills and competencies" and "new roles and joint efforts but specific competencies". The results show that interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement depends on participants defining their own rehabilitation goals, which function as a professional unifying platform for the interdisciplinary collaboration. The challenges for participants in reablement are often complex and include assessments, effort and a need for close collaboration between several different professionals. A tight interdisciplinary collaboration causes major changes in roles, often from a particular role to a more general role with broader job tasks. Although different professionals perform the same rehabilitation tasks, it is important that each professional contributes their unique competence and thus together they complete each other's competencies. Factors that have a positive impact on interdisciplinary collaboration in reablement are participants' definitions of their goals, number and variety of professionals involved, how closely these professionals collaborate, the amount of time for communication and shared planning and decision making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Unspecified 5 7%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Unspecified 6 8%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 28 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,859,143
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#399
of 826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,216
of 310,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.