↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Update on management options in the treatment of nosocomial and ventilator assisted pneumonia: review of actual guidelines and economic aspects of therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Update on management options in the treatment of nosocomial and ventilator assisted pneumonia: review of actual guidelines and economic aspects of therapy
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/idr.s25985
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Wilke, Rolf Grube

Abstract

Nosocomial or more exactly, hospital-acquired (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are frequent conditions when treating intensive care unit (ICU) patients that are only exceeded by central line-associated bloodstream infections. In Germany, approximately 18,900 patients per year suffer from a VAP and another 4,200 from HAP. We therefore reviewed the current guidelines about HAP and VAP, from different sources, regarding the strategies to address individual patient risks and medication strategies for initial intravenous antibiotic treatment (IIAT).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 20 18%
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,399,716
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#404
of 1,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,470
of 307,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,626 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.