↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Vitamin D prohormone in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D prohormone in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease
Published in
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijnrd.s97637
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Friedl, Emanuel Zitt

Abstract

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) represents the adaptive and very often, finally, maladaptive response of the organism to control the disturbed homeostasis of calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin D metabolism caused by declining renal function in chronic kidney disease (CKD). sHPT leads to cardiovascular and extravascular calcifications and is directly linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as excess all-cause mortality. Vitamin D plays an important role in the development of sHPT. CKD patients are characterized by a high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D. Supplementation with both vitamin D prohormones cholecalciferol and ergocalciferol enables the achievement and maintenance of a normal vitamin D status when given in adequate doses over an appropriate treatment period. In patients with earlier stages of CKD, sHPT is influenced by and can be successfully treated with vitamin D prohormone supplementation, whereas in patients with very late stages of CKD and those requiring dialysis, treatment with prohormones seems to be of limited efficacy. This review gives an overview of the pathogenesis of sHPT, summarizes vitamin D metabolism, and discusses the existing literature regarding the role of vitamin D prohormone in the treatment of sHPT in patients with CKD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 25%
Other 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 22 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,063,221
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#103
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,387
of 310,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.