| Title |
Registration of acute stroke: validity in the Danish Stroke Registry and the Danish National Registry of Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s50449 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathrine Wildenschild, Frank Mehnert, Reimar Wernich Thomsen, Helle Klingenberg Iversen, Karsten Vestergaard, Annette Ingeman, Søren Paaske Johnsen |
| Abstract |
The validity of the registration of patients in stroke-specific registries has seldom been investigated, nor compared with administrative hospital discharge registries. The objective of this study was to examine the validity of the registration of patients in a stroke-specific registry (The Danish Stroke Registry [DSR]) and a hospital discharge registry (The Danish National Patient Registry [DNRP]). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 33% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,359,382
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#565
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,154
of 307,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.