| Title |
3D conductive nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s54668 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aref Shahini, Mostafa Yazdimamaghani, Kenneth J Walker, Margaret A Eastman, Hamed Hatami-Marbini, Brenda J Smith, John L Ricci, Sundar V Madihally, Daryoosh Vashaee, Lobat Tayebi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 230 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 61 | 25% |
| Materials Science | 38 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 66 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,067,342
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#736
of 4,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,058
of 323,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#21
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.