↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Improving aqueous solubility and antitumor effects by nanosized gambogic acid-mPEG2000 micelles

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Improving aqueous solubility and antitumor effects by nanosized gambogic acid-mPEG2000 micelles
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s54050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lulu Cai, Neng Qiu, Mingli Xiang, Rongsheng Tong, Junfeng Yan, Lin He, Jianyou Shi, Tao Chen, Jiaolin Wen, Wenwen Wang, Lijuan Chen

Abstract

The clinical application of gambogic acid, a natural component with promising antitumor activity, is limited due to its extremely poor aqueous solubility, short half-life in blood, and severe systemic toxicity. To solve these problems, an amphiphilic polymer-drug conjugate was prepared by attachment of low molecular weight (ie, 2 kDa) methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether (mPEG) to gambogic acid (GA-mPEG₂₀₀₀) through an ester linkage and characterized by (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance. The GA-mPEG₂₀₀₀ conjugates self-assembled to form nanosized micelles, with mean diameters of less than 50 nm, and a very narrow particle size distribution. The properties of the GA-mPEG₂₀₀₀ micelles, including morphology, stability, molecular modeling, and drug release profile, were evaluated. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazo l-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) tests demonstrated that the GA-mPEG₂₀₀₀ micelle formulation had obvious cytotoxicity to tumor cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Further, GA-mPEG₂₀₀₀ micelles were effective in inhibiting tumor growth and prolonged survival in subcutaneous B16-F10 and C26 tumor models. Our findings suggest that GA-mPEG₂₀₀₀ micelles may have promising applications in tumor therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Master 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,664
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,723
of 320,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#41
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.