Title |
Cytotoxicity and apoptosis induced by nanobacteria in human breast cancer cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s54906 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ming-jun Zhang, Sheng-nan Liu, Ge Xu, Ya-nan Guo, Jian-nan Fu, De-chun Zhang |
Abstract |
The existing evidence that nanobacteria (NB) are closely associated with human disease is overwhelming. However, their potential toxicity against cancer cells has not yet been reported. The objective of this study was to investigate the cytotoxic effects of NB and nanohydroxyapatites (nHAPs) against human breast cancer cells and to elucidate the mechanisms of action underlying their cytotoxicity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 24% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 24% |
Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 36% |
Engineering | 3 | 12% |
Chemistry | 3 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,954,094
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#69
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,433
of 320,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.