| Title |
Functional MRI brain imaging studies using the Contact Heat Evoked Potential Stimulator (CHEPS) in a human volunteer topical capsaicin pain model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s24810 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ravikiran Shenoy, Katherine Roberts, Anastasia Papadaki, Donald McRobbie, Maarten Timmers, Theo Meert, Praveen Anand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 27% |
| Engineering | 8 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,459,013
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,160
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,637
of 133,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.