↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Defective DNA repair mechanisms in prostate cancer: impact of olaparib

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Defective DNA repair mechanisms in prostate cancer: impact of olaparib
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, March 2017
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s110264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca De Felice, Vincenzo Tombolini, Francesco Marampon, Angela Musella, Claudia Marchetti

Abstract

The field of prostate oncology has continued to change dramatically. It has truly become a field that is intensely linked to molecular genetic alterations, especially DNA-repair defects. Germline breast cancer 1 gene (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2 gene (BRCA2) mutations are implicated in the highest risk of prostate cancer (PC) predisposition and aggressiveness. Poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) proteins play a key role in DNA repair mechanisms and represent a valid target for new therapies. Olaparib is an oral PARP inhibitor that blocks DNA repair pathway and coupled with BRCA mutated-disease results in tumor cell death. In phase II clinical trials, including patients with advanced castration-resistant PC, olaparib seems to be efficacious and well tolerated. Waiting for randomized phase III trials, olaparib should be considered as a promising treatment option for PC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,128,007
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#556
of 2,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,394
of 325,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#16
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.