↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Aberrant promoter methylation profiles and association with survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Aberrant promoter methylation profiles and association with survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s128058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dani Zhong, Hong Cen

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic and diagnostic value of genes with promoter methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. On the basis of The Cancer Genome Atlas data, we identified genes with differentially methylated promoters in HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues, using the linear models for microarray data approach. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was applied to access the prognostic value of identified differentially methylated genes. The diagnostic value of the genes was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic. Pathway analyses were performed to illustrate biological functions of the identified genes. Compared to adjacent tissues, 77 genes with hypermethylated promoters and 2,412 genes with hypomethylated promoters were identified in HCC. The promoter hypomethylations of RNA5SP38, IL21, SDC4P, and MIR4439 were found to be associated with HCC patient survival (P=0.035, 0.040, 0.004, and 0.024, respectively). Hypomethylated SDC4P was associated with a better prognosis (hazard ratio, 0.482; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.147-1.110; P=0.007). The combination of the promoter hypomethylations with RNA5SP38, IL21, and SDC4P showed an area under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.975 (95% CI, 0.962-0.989; P=4.811E-25). Several pathways, including olfactory transduction, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, as well as inflammation mediated by chemokine and cytokine signaling pathway, were annotated with the hypomethylated promoter genes. SDC4P promoter hypomethylation may be a potential prognosis biomarker. A panel of promoter methylations in RNA5SP38, IL21, and SDC4P was proven a novel approach to diagnosis HCC. The pathway analysis defined the extensive functional role of DNA hypomethylation in cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,597
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,468
of 324,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#47
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.