↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Acute stimulation effect of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum in patients with refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder – a double-blinded trial

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Acute stimulation effect of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum in patients with refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder – a double-blinded trial
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s54964
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hsin-Chi Tsai, Chun-Hung Chang, Jiann-I Pan, Hung-Jen Hsieh, Sheng-Tzung Tsai, Hsiang-Yi Hung, Shin-Yuan Chen

Abstract

Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) for treating refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has shown positive results in small clinical trials. Ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) is one of the promising targets; however, whether or not acute stimulation test can provide substantial information for chronic stimulation is not yet known. We evaluated postoperative test stimulation and examined the relationship of acute simulation-induced smile/laughter and 15-month clinical outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Unspecified 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 38%
Unspecified 9 11%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,901
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,815
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#36
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.