↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pharmacokinetics and outcome of tazobactam/piperacillin in Japanese patients undergoing low-flow continuous renal replacement therapy: dosage considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics and outcome of tazobactam/piperacillin in Japanese patients undergoing low-flow continuous renal replacement therapy: dosage considerations
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, February 2017
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s127502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanako Kohama, Takeshi Ide, Kazuro Ikawa, Norifumi Morikawa, Shinichi Nishi

Abstract

Tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC), which is often combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), induces renal excretion and is thought to have a high component removal rate for blood purification. CRRT procedures vary depending on the country, region, and institution. It is not clear whether the dose of TAZ/PIPC for use in Japan can be determined based on studies conducted in other countries. Therefore, in this study, we examined the suitability of recommended dose in Japan. The study subjects consisted of 10 patients who received TAZ/PIPC during CRRT in the intensive care unit of Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan. We used a one-compartment model to characterize and parameterize the pharmacokinetics of TAZ/PIPC because their blood levels were eliminated monoexponentially. Compared with the data of healthy adults, the half-lives (t1/2) of both PIPC and TAZ were prolonged while their clearance rates decreased. For the continuous hemodiafiltration procedure adopted in Japan, we concluded that the dose and frequency were appropriate because the patients who received PIPC/TAZ 2.25 g twice a day during continuous hemodiafiltration maintained appropriate blood levels of both PIPC and TAZ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,015,637
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#96
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,766
of 427,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them