| Title |
Shared decision-making for biologic treatment of autoimmune disease: influence on adherence, persistence, satisfaction, and health care costs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s133222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer H Lofland, Phaedra T Johnson, Mike P Ingham, Sarah C Rosemas, John C White, Lorie Ellis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 28% |
| United States | 4 | 22% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 43 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,389,050
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#54
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,546
of 328,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.