↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

CUL4A promotes cell invasion in gastric cancer by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Biologics: Targets & Therapy, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
CUL4A promotes cell invasion in gastric cancer by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway
Published in
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/btt.s127650
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Gong, Xiao-Jun Xiang, Miao Feng, Jun Chen, Zi-Ling Fang, Jian-Ping Xiong

Abstract

Cullin 4A (CUL4A) overexpression has been reported to be involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of many malignant tumors. However, the role of CUL4A in the progression of gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. In this study, we explored whether and how CUL4A regulates proinflammatory signaling to promote GC cell invasion. Our results showed that knockdown of CUL4A inhibited GC cell migration and invasion induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. We also found that both CUL4A and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) protein expressions were enhanced by LPS stimulation in HGC27 GC cell lines. Furthermore, knockdown of CUL4A decreased the protein expression of NF-κB and mRNA expression of the downstream genes of the NF-κB pathway, such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2, MMP9, and interleukin-8. Our immunohistochemistry analysis on 50 GC tissue samples also revealed that CUL4A positively correlated with NF-κB expression. Taken together, our findings suggest that CUL4A may promote GC cell invasion by regulating the NF-κB signaling pathway and could be considered as a potential therapeutic target in patients with GC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#187
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,796
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.