↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Proteinuria and its relation to cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 241)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Proteinuria and its relation to cardiovascular disease
Published in
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, December 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijnrd.s40522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma Currie, Christian Delles

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its associated morbidity pose a worldwide health problem. As well as risk of endstage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of premature death among the CKD population. Proteinuria is a marker of renal injury that can often be detected earlier than any tangible decline in glomerular filtration rate. As well as being a risk marker for decline in renal function, proteinuria is now widely accepted as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This review will address the prognostic implications of proteinuria in the general population as well as other specific disease states including diabetes, hypertension and heart failure. A variety of pathophysiological mechanisms that may underlie the relationship between renal and cardiovascular disease have been proposed, including insulin resistance, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. As proteinuria has evolved into a therapeutic target for cardiovascular risk reduction in the clinical setting we will also review therapeutic strategies that should be considered for patients with persistent proteinuria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 41 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 47 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,340,716
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#50
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,810
of 321,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.