↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Relationship between medication beliefs, self-reported and refill adherence, and symptoms in patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between medication beliefs, self-reported and refill adherence, and symptoms in patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s44185
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mna Van Steenis, Ja Driesenaar, Jm Bensing, R Van Hulten, Pc Souverein, L Van Dijk, Pagm De Smet, Am Van Dulmen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,085,280
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#465
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,237
of 321,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.