The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Relationship between medication beliefs, self-reported and refill adherence, and symptoms in patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s44185 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mna Van Steenis, Ja Driesenaar, Jm Bensing, R Van Hulten, Pc Souverein, L Van Dijk, Pagm De Smet, Am Van Dulmen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 39% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,312,401
of 26,381,372 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#472
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,655
of 323,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,372 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.