↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prevalence of and risk factors for age-related macular degeneration in Nepal: the Bhaktapur Retina Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of and risk factors for age-related macular degeneration in Nepal: the Bhaktapur Retina Study
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/opth.s132338
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raba Thapa, Sanyam Bajimaya, Govinda Paudyal, Shankar Khanal, Stevie Tan, Suman S Thapa, Ger van Rens

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the prevalence of and risk factors for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in an elderly population in Nepal. This is a population-based, cross-sectional study. A sample size of 2,100 was calculated. A total of 1,860 (88.6%) subjects aged >60 years were enrolled for the study from 30 clusters in the district. Detailed history, visual acuity, and anterior segment and posterior segment examinations were performed. AMD was graded according to the International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. Among the total study population, 659 subjects had any AMD (35.43%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.25-37.65), 484 had mild dry AMD (26.02%; 95% CI: 24.04-28.08), 143 had intermediate dry AMD (7.69%; 95% CI: 6.52-8.99), 19 had geographic atrophy (1.02%; 95% CI: 0.61-1.59), and 13 had wet AMD (0.70%; 95% CI: 0.37-1.19). The overall prevalence of early and late AMD was 33.71% and 1.72%, respectively. Among subjects with dry and wet AMD, 36.53% and 46.1% had visual impairment, while 2.78% and 23.08% were blind, respectively. In multivariate analysis, AMD was significantly higher in subjects with an increased number of cigarettes smoked per day (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; P=0.007) and in subjects with pseudophakia (OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.12-1.87; P=0.005). One-third of the population aged ≥60 years have some form of AMD. There was a significant association with the number of cigarettes consumed and with previous cataract surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,345
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,560
of 324,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.