↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Unmet needs in the management of schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Unmet needs in the management of schizophrenia
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s41063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Torres-González, Inmaculada Ibanez-Casas, Sandra Saldivia, Dinarte Ballester, Pamela Grandón, Berta Moreno-Küstner, Miguel Xavier, Manuel Gómez-Beneyto

Abstract

Studies on unmet needs during the last decades have played a significant role in the development and dissemination of evidence-based community practices for persistent schizophrenia and other severe mental disorders. This review has thoroughly considered several blocks of unmet needs, which are frequently related to schizophrenic disorders. Those related to health have been the first block to be considered, in which authors have examined the frequent complications and comorbidities found in schizophrenia, such as substance abuse and dual diagnosis. A second block has been devoted to psychosocial and economic needs, especially within the field of recovery of the persistently mentally ill. Within this block, the effects of the current economic difficulties shown in recent literature have been considered as well. Because no patient is static, a third block has reviewed evolving needs according to the clinical staging model. The fourth block has been dedicated to integrated evidence-based interventions to improve the quality of life of persons with schizophrenia. Consideration of community care for those reluctant to maintain contact with mental health services has constituted the fifth block. Finally, authors have aggregated their own reflections regarding future trends. The number of psychosocial unmet needs is extensive. Vast research efforts will be needed to find appropriate ways to meet them, particularly regarding so-called existential needs, but many needs could be met only by applying existing evidence-based interventions. Reinforcing research on the implementation strategies and capacity building of professionals working in community settings might address this problem. The final aim should be based on the collaborative model of care, which rests on the performance of a case manager responsible for monitoring patient progress, providing assertive follow-up, teaching self-help strategies, and facilitating communication among the patient, family doctor, mental health specialist, and other specialists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 28%
Psychology 36 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 53 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,856,238
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#985
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,903
of 320,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#19
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.