The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Incidence and causes of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in a center of Catania
|
---|---|
Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s4509 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marco Sciuto, Gaetano Bertino, Mariangela Zocco, Ignazio Vecchio, Rocco Raffaele, Rosario R Trifiletti, Piero Pavone |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#461
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,550
of 108,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.