| Title |
Correlation of CT findings remote from prime area of interest: a multitrauma study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oaem.s35341 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel Bardon, Noel Young, Poppy Sindhusake, Theresa Lee, Ken Le |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 71% |
| Psychology | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,414,665
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#30
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,299
of 190,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them