↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparative evaluation of 64-slice CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in assessing the cervicocranial vasculature

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Comparative evaluation of 64-slice CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography in assessing the cervicocranial vasculature
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, August 2008
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s2807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randolf Klingebiel, Max Kentenich, Hans-Christian Bauknecht, Florian Masuhr, Eberhard Siebert, Markus Busch, Georg Bohner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 52%
Engineering 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2012.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#301
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,789
of 97,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.