The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||82||19%|
|Student > Master||63||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||33||8%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||27||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||55||13%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||53||13%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||50||12%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||31||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 165,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.