↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pathogenesis of coronary artery disease: focus on genetic risk factors and identification of genetic variants

Overview of attention for article published in The Application of Clinical Genetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
Title
Pathogenesis of coronary artery disease: focus on genetic risk factors and identification of genetic variants
Published in
The Application of Clinical Genetics, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/tacg.s35301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergi Sayols-Baixeras, Carla Lluís-Ganella, Gavin Lucas, Roberto Elosua

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide, and its prevalence is expected to increase in the coming years. CAD events are caused by the interplay of genetic and environmental factors, the effects of which are mainly mediated through cardiovascular risk factors. The techniques used to study the genetic basis of these diseases have evolved from linkage studies to candidate gene studies and genome-wide association studies. Linkage studies have been able to identify genetic variants associated with monogenic diseases, whereas genome-wide association studies have been more successful in determining genetic variants associated with complex diseases. Currently, genome-wide association studies have identified approximately 40 loci that explain 6% of the heritability of CAD. The application of this knowledge to clinical practice is challenging, but can be achieved using various strategies, such as genetic variants to identify new therapeutic targets, personal genetic information to improve disease risk prediction, and pharmacogenomics. The main aim of this narrative review is to provide a general overview of our current understanding of the genetics of coronary artery disease and its potential clinical utility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 313 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 83 26%
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Researcher 19 6%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 92 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 95 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,964,263
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,408
of 321,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Application of Clinical Genetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them