↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Differential effects of amyloid-beta peptide aggregation status on in vivo retinal neurotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in Eye and Brain, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Differential effects of amyloid-beta peptide aggregation status on in vivo retinal neurotoxicity
Published in
Eye and Brain, August 2010
DOI 10.2147/eb.s9902
Pubmed ID
Authors

H R Watts, Pjb Anderson, D Ma, K L Philpott, S M Jen, M Croucher, L S Jen, S M Gentleman

Abstract

The present study examined the relationship between amyloid beta (Aβ)-peptide aggregation state and neurotoxicity in vivo using the rat retinal-vitreal model. Following single unilateral intravitreal injection of either soluble Aβ1-42 or Aβ1-42 preaggregated for different periods, retinal pathology was evaluated at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1-month postinjection. Injection of either soluble Aβ (sAβ) or preaggregated Aβ induced a rapid reduction in immunoreactivity (IR) for synaptophysin, suggesting that direct contact with neurons is not necessary to disrupt synapses. Acute neuronal ionic and metabolic dysfunction was demonstrated by widespread loss of IR to the calcium buffering protein parvalbumin (PV) and protein gene product 9.5, a component of the ubiquitin-proteosome system. Injection of sAβ appeared to have a more rapid impact on PV than the preaggregated treatments, producing a marked reduction in PV cell diameters at 48 hours, an effect that was only observed for preaggregated Aβ after 1-month survival. Extending the preaggregation period from 4 to 8 days to obtain highly fibrillar Aβ species significantly increased the loss of choline acteyltransferase IR, but had no effect on PV-IR. These findings prompt the conclusion that Aβ assembly state has a significant impact on in vivo neurotoxicity by triggering distinct molecular changes within the cell.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,784,834
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Eye and Brain
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,522
of 104,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye and Brain
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them