↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Overview of the role of nanotechnological innovations in the detection and treatment of solid tumors

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Overview of the role of nanotechnological innovations in the detection and treatment of solid tumors
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s50941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derusha Frank, Charu Tyagi, Lomas Tomar, Yahya E Choonara, Lisa C du Toit, Pradeep Kumar, Clement Penny, Viness Pillay

Abstract

Nanotechnology, although still in its infantile stages, has the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of disease progression and success of therapy for numerous diseases and conditions, not least of which is cancer. As it is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, early cancer detection, as well as safe and efficacious therapeutic intervention, will be indispensable in improving the prognosis related to cancers and overall survival rate, as well as health-related quality of life of patients diagnosed with cancer. The development of a relatively new field of nanomedicine, which combines various domains and technologies including nanotechnology, medicine, biology, pharmacology, mathematics, physics, and chemistry, has yielded different approaches to addressing these challenges. Of particular relevance in cancer, nanosystems have shown appreciable success in the realm of diagnosis and treatment. Characteristics attributable to these systems on account of the nanoscale size range allow for individualization of therapy, passive targeting, the attachment of targeting moieties for more specific targeting, minimally invasive procedures, and real-time imaging and monitoring of in vivo processes. Furthermore, incorporation into nanosystems may have the potential to reintroduce into clinical practice drugs that are no longer used because of various shortfalls, as well as aid in the registration of new, potent drugs with suboptimal pharmacokinetic profiles. Research into the development of nanosystems for cancer diagnosis and therapy is thus a rapidly emerging and viable field of study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 117 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 26%
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 15%
Chemistry 16 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,731,975
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,538
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,378
of 320,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#31
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.