↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Characteristics of tongue and pharyngeal pressure in patients with neuromuscular diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Characteristics of tongue and pharyngeal pressure in patients with neuromuscular diseases
Published in
Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/dnnd.s132745
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Umemoto, Hirokazu Furuya, Yoshio Tsuboi, Shinsuke Fujioka, Hajime Arahata, Miwa Sugahara, Mitsuaki Sakai

Abstract

Tongue and pharyngeal pressure is an essential factor associated with the swallowing function; however, little is known about the difference in tongue and pharyngeal pressure between neuromuscular diseases. This study aimed to characterize tongue and pharyngeal pressure in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. This study recruited 17 DMD patients, 32 DM1 patients, and 26 ALS patients. They underwent separate measurements of tongue and pharyngeal pressure under videofluoroscopy, swallowing 5 mL of barium water. We measured the largest change in pharyngeal pressure in the hypopharynx and the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) over several swallows. The mean tongue pressure (TP) was greatest in the DMD group than in the other groups (p<0.01). There was a significant difference in pressure changes in the hypopharynx and UES between the DM1 group and other groups (p<0.01). Significant correlations were observed between pressure change in the UES and the patient's age in the DMD group (R=-0.500, p=0.045) and between pressure change in the hypopharynx and TP in the DM1 group (R=0.421, p=0.016). There was a significant correlation between pressure change in the hypopharynx and disease severity in the ALS group (R=0.435, p=0.030). Patients with DMD, DM1, and ALS have weakness in the muscles involved in swallowing; however, the results of this study suggested that each disorder has a distinctive profile of impairment in the swallowing function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,791,459
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#41
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,127
of 325,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.