↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Impact of a value-based insurance design for physical therapy to treat back pain on care utilization and cost
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s135813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel D Maeng, Anthony Graboski, Peiling L Allison, Dorothy Y Fisher, John B Bulger

Abstract

To assess the impact of a value-based insurance design providing enhanced access to physical therapy (PT) for treatment of back pain on treatment patterns and cost of care. A retrospective analysis of claims data obtained from Geisinger Health Plan (GHP). In April 2013, GHP began offering "PT bundle" - i.e., a bundle of up to five PT visits for a single one-time copay that can be renewed for another bundle of five PT visits - for its employer-based plan members with back pain. A cohort of GHP members who were preauthorized for the PT bundle were compared against a contemporaneous cohort of GHP members who were preauthorized for PT under the standard per-visit copay arrangement between January 2013 and October 2014. Among the PT bundle cohort, the PT visit rate during the first 9 months since the PT preauthorization date had dramatically increased and then gradually decreased in subsequent months. The PT bundle was also associated with 29%-35% short-term reductions in emergency department visits and with 12%-20% reductions in primary care visits after 6 months. No significant impact on hospitalization or cost was observed. Implementation of the PT bundle appears to have led to a change in the treatment pattern of back pain that is more consistent with the recommended guidelines to use more conservative management such as PT as the first-line treatment for back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 17 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,826,052
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#328
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,011
of 325,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#8
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.