↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Advance care planning in stroke: influence of time on engagement in the process

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Advance care planning in stroke: influence of time on engagement in the process
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s54822
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa Green, Shreyas Gandhi, Tessa Kleissen, Jessica Simon, Shelley Raffin-Bouchal, Karla Ryckborst

Abstract

Individuals who experience stroke have a higher likelihood of subsequent stroke events, making it imperative to plan for future medical care. In the event of a further serious health event, engaging in the process of advanced care planning (ACP) can help family members and health care professionals (HCPs) make medical decisions for individuals who have lost the capacity to do so. Few studies have explored the views and experiences of patients with stroke about discussing their wishes and preferences for future medical events, and the extent to which stroke HCPs engage in conversations around planning for such events. In this study, we sought to understand how the process of ACP unfolded between HCPs and patients post-stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Master 11 22%
Other 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 29%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Psychology 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 4 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,472,708
of 16,459,791 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#294
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,174
of 259,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,459,791 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.