↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Tipepidine in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a 4-week, open-label, preliminary study

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Tipepidine in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a 4-week, open-label, preliminary study
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s58480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsuyoshi Sasaki, Kenji Hashimoto, Masumi Tachibana, Tsutomu Kurata, Keiko Okawada, Maki Ishikawa, Hiroshi Kimura, Hideki Komatsu, Masatomo Ishikawa, Tadashi Hasegawa, Akihiro Shiina, Tasuku Hashimoto, Nobuhisa Kanahara, Tetsuya Shiraishi, Masaomi Iyo

Abstract

Tipepidine (3-[di-2-thienylmethylene]-1-methylpiperidine) has been used solely as a nonnarcotic antitussive in Japan since 1959. The safety of tipepidine in children and adults has already been established. It is reported that tipepidine inhibits G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK)-channel currents. The inhibition of GIRK channels by tipepidine is expected to modulate the level of monoamines in the brain. We put forward the hypothesis that tipepidine can improve attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms by modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission through the inhibition of GIRK channels. The purpose of this open-label trial was to confirm whether treatment with tipepidine can improve symptoms in pediatric patients with ADHD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Psychology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,495,301
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#827
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,510
of 319,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#11
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.