| Title |
Nanoparticles for multimodal in vivo imaging in nanomedicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s53717 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaehong Key, James F Leary |
| Abstract |
While nanoparticles are usually designed for targeted drug delivery, they can also simultaneously provide diagnostic information by a variety of in vivo imaging methods. These diagnostic capabilities make use of specific properties of nanoparticle core materials. Near-infrared fluorescent probes provide optical detection of cells targeted by real-time nanoparticle-distribution studies within the organ compartments of live, anesthetized animals. By combining different imaging modalities, we can start with deep-body imaging by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography, and by using optical imaging, get down to the resolution required for real-time fluorescence-guided surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 265 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 26% |
| Researcher | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 57 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 10% |
| Engineering | 25 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 21% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,274,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#176
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,579
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#4
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.