↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Antecedents of positive self-disclosure online: an empirical study of US college students’ Facebook usage

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Antecedents of positive self-disclosure online: an empirical study of US college students’ Facebook usage
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s136049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongliang Chen

Abstract

This study investigates the factors predicting positive self-disclosure on social networking sites (SNSs). There is a formidable body of empirical research relating to online self-disclosure, but very few studies have assessed the antecedents of positive self-disclosure. To address this literature gap, the current study tests the effects of self-esteem, life satisfaction, social anxiety, privacy concerns, public self-consciousness (SC), and perceived collectivism on positive self-disclosure on SNSs. Data were collected online via Qualtrics in April 2013. Respondents were undergraduate students from the University of Connecticut. Using ordinary least squares regression, the current study found that self-esteem and perceived collectivism increased positive self-disclosure, life satisfaction, and privacy concerns decreased positive self-disclosure, and the effects of social anxiety and public SC were not significant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 6 9%
Lecturer 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 29 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 23%
Computer Science 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 32 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,464,404
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#348
of 566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,794
of 310,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.