↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pregnancy outcomes in younger and older adolescent mothers with severe preeclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Pregnancy outcomes in younger and older adolescent mothers with severe preeclampsia
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s131050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priscila E Parra-Pingel, Luis A Quisiguiña-Avellán, Luis Hidalgo, Peter Chedraui, Faustino R Pérez-López

Abstract

Adolescent mothers are at higher risk for preeclampsia, but the effect of their age on the outcome of the pregnancy complication is not clear. To describe maternal and neonatal outcomes among singleton adolescent pregnancies complicated with severe preeclampsia in a low-income-setting hospital and compare results according to age. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of 213 adolescent mothers complicated with severe preeclampsia delivering at the Enrique C. Sotomayor Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (Guayaquil, Ecuador) were analyzed and compared according to their age (16 or less years, n=82 vs 17-19 years, n=131). Cesarean section rate was high in both studied groups; otherwise, obstetrical outcome did not differ and there were no maternal deaths or severe complications. Neonatal outcome was adverse in the two groups evidenced by high rates of preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age and low-birth-weight infants, low first-minute Apgar scores and admissions to neonatal intensive care; however, it was not significantly different between the analyzed groups. There were no neonatal deaths among mothers aged 16 or less and 4 in the group aged 17-19 years. This was, however, not significant (p=0.30). Pregnancy outcome in this adolescent population with severe preeclampsia was similarly adverse, independent of maternal age.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 35 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 37 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,229,642
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#99
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,109
of 330,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.