↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Outcome of tuberculosis treatment and its predictors among HIV infected patients in southwest Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Outcome of tuberculosis treatment and its predictors among HIV infected patients in southwest Ethiopia
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s135305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adane Teshome Kefale, Yeniewa Kerie Anagaw

Abstract

Co-infection with HIV challenges treatment of tuberculosis (TB) and worsens the outcome. This study aimed to assess the outcome of TB treatment and its predictors among HIV infected patients at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital (MTUTH), Ethiopia. Medical records of 188 TB/HIV co-infected patients who attended the TB clinic of MTUTH from September 2012 to December 2015 were reviewed from March 14 to April 1, 2016. The primary endpoints of the study were treatment outcome of TB and its predictors. Data were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify predictors of treatment outcome. Statistical significance was considered at p-value <0.05. The treatment outcomes of TB patients included in this study were 18 (9.57%) cured, 20 (10.64%) defaulted, 24 (12.77%) died, 39 (20.74%) completed the treatment, and 87 (46.28%) transferred out. A successful treatment outcome was achieved in 57 (30.32%) patients. Initial World Health Organization (WHO) clinical stage III (COR: 2.60; 95%CI: 1.17-5.76) and stage IV (COR: 4.00; 95%CI: 1.29-12.40) were associated with unfavorable outcome. Both WHO stages (III, IV) at the time of HIV diagnosis were independent predictors of poor treatment outcome (AOR: 3.08; 95%CI: 1.14-8.38; AOR: 5.80; 95%CI: 1.36-24.71 respectively). However, smear positive TB was an independent predictor of a favorable treatment outcome (AOR: 2.50; 95%CI: 1.13-5.51). This study revealed that treatment outcome of TB patients was unsatisfactory, which signals a need for improved care. Advanced WHO clinical stages were predictors of poor outcome, while smear positive TB favors good outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 28%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 18%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,467,011
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#282
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,228
of 316,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.