↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Panel of seven long noncoding RNA as a candidate prognostic biomarker for ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Panel of seven long noncoding RNA as a candidate prognostic biomarker for ovarian cancer
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s128797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaohui Zhan, Chuanpeng Dong, Gang Liu, Yixue Li, Lei Liu

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common and lethal gynecological malignancies. The diagnosis of ovarian cancer is often at an advanced stage. Accumulated evidence suggests that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles during ovarian tumorigenesis. In this study, using the lncRNA-mining approach, we analyzed lncRNA expression profiles of 493 ovarian cancer patients from Gene Expression Omnibus datasets, and identified a signature group of seven lncRNAs (BC037530, AK021924, AK094536, AK094536, BC062365, BC004123 and BC007937) associated with patient survival in the training dataset GSE9891. We also formulated a risk score model to divide patients into low-risk and high-risk groups based on the expression of these seven lncRNAs. We further validated the predictive power of our risk score model in two other datasets, GSE26193 and GSE63885. Our analysis showed that the seven-lncRNA signature can serve as an independent predictor apart from Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and patient age. Further investigation revealed the seven-lncRNA signature correlated with few critical signaling pathways involved in cancer. Combined, all these findings strongly support that the seven-lncRNA signature can serve as a strong prognosis biomarker.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 35%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 35%
Engineering 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,820,518
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#148
of 2,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,223
of 331,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#5
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.