↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Inorganic nanoparticles kill Toxoplasma gondii via changes in redox status and mitochondrial membrane potential

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Inorganic nanoparticles kill Toxoplasma gondii via changes in redox status and mitochondrial membrane potential
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s122178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oluyomi Stephen Adeyemi, Yuho Murata, Tatsuki Sugi, Kentaro Kato

Abstract

This study evaluated the anti-Toxoplasma gondii potential of gold, silver, and platinum nanoparticles (NPs). Inorganic NPs (0.01-1,000 µg/mL) were screened for antiparasitic activity. The NPs caused >90% inhibition of T. gondii growth with EC50 values of ≤7, ≤1, and ≤100 µg/mL for gold, silver, and platinum NPs, respectively. The NPs showed no host cell cytotoxicity at the effective anti-T. gondii concentrations; the estimated selectivity index revealed a ≥20-fold activity toward the parasite versus the host cell. The anti-T. gondii activity of the NPs, which may be linked to redox signaling, affected the parasite mitochondrial membrane potential and parasite invasion, replication, recovery, and infectivity potential. Our results demonstrated the antiparasitic potential of NPs. The findings support the further exploration of NPs as a possible source of alternative and effective anti-T. gondii agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 22 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Chemistry 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 27 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,924,766
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#938
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,085
of 426,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#21
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.