↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A randomized controlled trial to validate the Alice PDX ambulatory device

Overview of attention for article published in Nature and science of sleep, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
A randomized controlled trial to validate the Alice PDX ambulatory device
Published in
Nature and science of sleep, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/nss.s133789
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georg Nilius, Ulrike Domanski, Maik Schroeder, Karl-Josef Franke, Anke Hogrebe, Laurent Margarit, Maria Stoica, Marie-Pia d’Ortho

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition; however, the majority of patients remain undiagnosed. There is a potential to expand the diagnostic capacity of sleep laboratories. The study objective was to validate a portable respiratory monitoring device (Alice PDX) against polysomnography (PSG) in the laboratory and to assess its reliability at home. A total of 85 patients with suspected OSA (80% male, mean age 49.1±13.5 years, body mass index 29.7±6.9 kg/m(2), Epworth Sleepiness Scale 10.0±5.1) were randomized to 3 diagnostic nights: 1 night simultaneous in-laboratory PSG and PDX recording; 1 night self-applied PDX at home, and 1 night in-laboratory PSG. Study data were manually scored according to American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria. The Alice PDX was in diagnostic agreement with simultaneously recorded reference PSG in 96.4% of studies. In 2.4% of studies the in-laboratory PDX underestimated and in 1.2% of studies it overestimated the apnea hypopnea index (AHI). The difference between the AHI from the reference PSG and the home study was similar to the difference between the PSGs (2.79 vs 0.79, p=0.08). In a population with a high suspicion of OSA, the Alice PDX showed a high level of diagnostic agreement with a simultaneous PSG and performed valid home diagnostic studies for OSA. If manually scored, the portable device can be used by sleep specialists for diagnosing moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea in cases with a high pretest probability for the disease over a wide range of disease severity. The technology can be deployed reliably outside of the sleep laboratory setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 21 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Unspecified 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 22 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,994,598
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#281
of 630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,287
of 330,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.