↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Factors influencing the selection of delivery with no one present in Northern Nigeria: implications for policy and programs

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Factors influencing the selection of delivery with no one present in Northern Nigeria: implications for policy and programs
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s54628
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bolaji Fapohunda, Nosakhare Orobaton

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of demographic, socioeconomic, and women's autonomy factors on the utilization of delivery assistance in Sokoto State, Nigeria. Data were obtained from the Nigeria 2008 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Bivariate analysis and logistic regression procedures were conducted. The study revealed that delivery with no one present and with unskilled attendance accounted for roughly 95% of all births in Sokoto State. Mothers with existing high risk factors, including higher parity, were more likely to select unsafe/unskilled delivery practices than younger, lower-parity mothers. Evidenced by the high prevalence of delivery with traditional birth attendants, this study demonstrates that expectant mothers are willing to obtain care from a provider, and their odds of using accessible, affordable, skilled delivery is high, should such an option be presented. This conclusion is supported by the high correlation between a mother's socioeconomic status and the likelihood of using skilled attendance. To improve the access to, and increase the affordability of, skilled health attendants, we recommended two solutions: 1) the use of cash subsidies to augment women's incomes in order to reduce finance-related barriers in the use of formal health services, thus increasing demand; and 2) a structural improvement that will increase women's economic security by improving their access to higher education, income, and urban ideation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Social Sciences 12 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,834,104
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#181
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,242
of 308,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.