↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 mutation in lung cancer: types, incidence, clinical features and impact on treatment

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 3,016)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 mutation in lung cancer: types, incidence, clinical features and impact on treatment
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s133245
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanita Noronha, Anuradha Choughule, Vijay M Patil, Amit Joshi, Rajiv Kumar, Deepa Susan Joy Philip, Shripad Banavali, Amit Dutt, Kumar Prabhash

Abstract

There are limited data available on the treatment and outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20-mutated lung cancer patients. Hence, we planned an analysis of the demographic details, clinical profile and survival of lung cancer patients with exon 20 mutations. We compared our results to patients with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitizing activating and EGFR/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative mutations. This was a retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients who were treated at our center between January 2010 and August 2014. We reviewed the results of EGFR mutation testing by real-time polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing. We also reviewed the data relating to baseline demographics, clinical profile, patient treatment and outcome measures in terms of response and overall survival (OS). A total of 580 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. In all, 227 (39.1%) patients had EGFR TKI-sensitizing activating mutations, 20 (3.4%) patients had exon 20 insertion mutations and 333 patients were EGFR/ALK mutation negative (57.5%). The median OS was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-9.8 months) in exon 20 insertion mutations, 16.1 months (95% CI 12.8-19.5 months) in EGFR TKI-sensitizing activating mutations and 10 months (95% CI 7.9-12.1 months) in EGFR/ALK mutation-negative patients. The median OS was significantly better for the EGFR TKI-sensitizing activating mutation group (P=0.000, log-rank test) and for the EGFR/ALK-negative group (P=0.037, log-rank test) compared to the exon 20-mutated group. Exon 20 mutation results in a poorer OS prognosis compared to EGFR- and ALK-negative patients and patients harboring EGFR TKI-sensitizing activating mutations. The incidence of de novo exon 20 insertions was 3.4%. Different types of exon mutations seem to have different outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,550,821
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#25
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,964
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.