| Title |
A qualitative study of adherence to nutritional treatment: perspectives of patients and dietitians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s54799 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronit Endevelt, Anat Gesser-Edelsburg |
| Abstract |
Effective interaction between care providers and patients is crucial for the success of most medical treatments; in nutritional medical treatment, it is of paramount importance. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the role of the dietitian-patient relationship and the counseling approach in influencing individual patient decisions to adhere to counseling by persisting with nutritional treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,811,377
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#136
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,233
of 322,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.