↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Molecular variants and mutations in medulloblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Molecular variants and mutations in medulloblastoma
Published in
Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/pgpm.s38698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin Schroeder, Sri Gururangan

Abstract

Medulloblastoma is the commonest malignant brain tumor in children. Treatment with surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy has improved outcomes in recent years, but patients are frequently left with devastating neurocognitive and other sequelae following such therapy. While the prognosis has traditionally been based on conventional histopathology and clinical staging (based on age, extent of resection, and presence or absence of metastasis), it has become apparent in recent years that the inherent biology of the tumor plays a significant part in predicting survival and sometimes supersedes clinical or pathologic risk factors. The advent of deep sequencing gene technology has provided invaluable clues to the molecular makeup of this tumor and allowed neuro-oncologists to understand that medulloblastoma is an amalgamation of several distinct disease entities with unique clinical associations and behavior. This review is a concise summary of the pathology, genetic syndromes, recent advances in molecular subgrouping, and the associated gene mutations and copy number variations in medulloblastoma. The association of molecular alterations with patient prognosis is also discussed, but it should be remembered that further validation is required in prospective clinical trials utilizing uniform treatment approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 20%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,247,404
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,627
of 324,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them