↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Palliative care and prognosis in COPD: a systematic review with a validation cohort

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Palliative care and prognosis in COPD: a systematic review with a validation cohort
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/copd.s135657
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pere Almagro, Sergi Yun, Ana Sangil, Mónica Rodríguez-Carballeira, Meritxell Marine, Pedro Landete, Juan José Soler-Cataluña, Joan B Soriano, Marc Miravitlles

Abstract

Current recommendations to consider initiation of palliative care (PC) in COPD patients are often based on an expected poor prognosis. However, this approach is not evidence-based, and which and when COPD patients should start PC is controversial. We aimed to assess whether current suggested recommendations for initiating PC were sufficiently reliable. We identified prognostic variables proposed in the literature for initiating PC; then, we ascertained their relationship with 1-year mortality, and finally, we validated their utility in our cohort of 697 patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation. From 24 articles of 499 screened, we selected 20 variables and retrieved 48 original articles in which we were able to calculate the relationship between each of them and 1-year mortality. The number of studies where 1-year mortality was detailed for these variables ranged from 9 for previous hospitalizations or FEV1 ≤30% to none for albumin ≤25 mg/dL. The percentage of 1-year mortality in the literature for these variables ranged from 5% to 60%. In the validation cohort study, the prevalence of these proposed variables ranged from 8% to 64%; only 10 of the 18 variables analyzed in our cohort reached statistical significance with Cox regression analysis, and none overcame an area under the curve ≥0.7. We conclude that none of the suggested criteria for initiating PC based on an expected poor vital prognosis in COPD patients in the short or medium term offers sufficient reliability, and consequently, they should be avoided as exclusive criteria for considering PC or at least critically appraised.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 23%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 41 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,865,509
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#143
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,404
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#3
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.