| Title |
Complication rate of posterior capsule rupture with vitreous loss during phacoemulsification at a Hawaiian cataract surgical center: a clinical audit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s57736 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming Chen, Kara C LaMattina, Thomas Patrianakos, Surendar Dwarakanathan |
| Abstract |
To compare the complication rate of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) with vitreous loss during phacoemulsification at an ambulatory surgical center with published results as a clinical audit for quality control. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#707
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,647
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.