↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Clinical differences between H3N2 and H1N1 influenza 2012 and lower respiratory tract infection found using a statistical classification approach

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Clinical differences between H3N2 and H1N1 influenza 2012 and lower respiratory tract infection found using a statistical classification approach
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s57429
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Zarogoulidis, Dimitris Petridis, Ioannis Kioumis, konstantinos Porpodis, Dionysios Spyratos, Haidong Huang, konstantinos Zarogoulidis, Aggeliki Rapti, Anastasios Kallianos, Georgia Trakada, Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt, Antonis Papaiwannou

Abstract

Influenza A H1N1 and H3N2 are two influenza waves that have been identified in past years.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Taiwan 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2014.
All research outputs
#987,573
of 4,505,915 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#88
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,246
of 126,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.