↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Human taeniasis: current insights into prevention and management strategies in endemic countries

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
Title
Human taeniasis: current insights into prevention and management strategies in endemic countries
Published in
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s116545
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna L Okello, Lian Francesca Thomas

Abstract

Human taeniasis is a zoonotic condition resulting from infection with the adult stages of Taenia saginata ("beef tapeworm"), Taenia solium ("pork tapeworm") or Taenia asiatica ("Asian tapeworm"). Although these parasites have a worldwide distribution, the overwhelming burden is felt by communities in low- and middle-income countries. This is particularly true for T. solium, whereby infection of the central nervous system with the larval stage of the parasite (neurocysticercosis) is a major cause of acquired epilepsy in low-resource settings. With a focus on endemic countries, this review provides an insight into the prevention and management of human taeniasis, concluding with some recent case studies describing their implementation. Discussion of the opportunities and challenges regarding current fecal and serological diagnostic assays for detecting Taenia spp. highlights the importance of accurate and accessible diagnostic options for the field situation. The lack of long-term impact on the parasites' lifecycle from human anthelmintic treatment, coupled with the propensity for adverse reactions, highlights the importance of a "two-pronged" approach that considers the relevant animal hosts, particularly in the case of T. solium. Aside from the therapeutic options, this review reiterates the importance of adequate assessment and consideration of the associated behavioral and policy aspects around sanitation, hygiene and meat inspection that have been shown to support parasite control, and potential elimination, in endemic regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 244 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Master 32 13%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Lecturer 12 5%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 90 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 34 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 92 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,351,475
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#283
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,874
of 316,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.