↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Histological evaluation of thyroid lesions using a scanning acoustic microscope

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology and laboratory medicine international PLMI, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Histological evaluation of thyroid lesions using a scanning acoustic microscope
Published in
Pathology and laboratory medicine international PLMI, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/plmi.s58343
Authors

Katsutoshi Miura, Hiroyuki Mineta

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Engineering 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pathology and laboratory medicine international PLMI
#16
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,652
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology and laboratory medicine international PLMI
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.