Title |
Assessment of cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease: prevalence and risk factors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s47367 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qiumei Wang, Zhenxin Zhang, Ling Li, Hongbo Wen, Qun Xu |
Abstract |
Although Parkinson's disease (PD) is clinically characterized by motor symptoms, cognitive impairment is one of the most disabling non-motor symptoms. Despite it attracting increasing attention worldwide, less is known about its prevalence in the Chinese population. The objective of this study was to assess cognitive impairment and related risk factors in Chinese PD patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 21% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
Psychology | 20 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,051
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,546
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#20
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.