↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Simulated interprofessional learning activities for rural health care services: perceptions of health care students

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Simulated interprofessional learning activities for rural health care services: perceptions of health care students
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s140989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Selina Taylor, Yaqoot Fatima, Navaratnam Lakshman, Helen Roberts

Abstract

The literature on interprofessional learning (IPL) has limited empirical evidence on the impact of simulated IPL sessions in promoting collaborative health care services in rural settings. This study aims to explore health care students' perception of the relevance of simulated IPL for rural health care services. Three focus group interviews were held with pre-registration medical, pharmacy, and allied health students (n=22). Students worked together to manage complex simulation scenarios in small interprofessional teams. Focus group sessions were held at the end of simulation activities to explore students' views on the relevance of simulated IPL activities. Thematic analysis was undertaken on the qualitative data obtained from the focus groups. Participants embraced both the interprofessional and the simulation components enthusiastically and perceived these to be useful for their future as rural health care practitioners. Four major themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: appreciation of the role of other health disciplines, collaborative approach to patient care, competency and skills for future health care practice, and relevance for future rural and remote health care practice. Students acknowledged the simulated IPL sessions for improving their understanding of multidisciplinary practice in rural practice and facilitating the appreciation for collaborative practice and expertise. Based on the findings of this study, simulated IPL activities seem to be a potential intervention for developing collaborative practice among pre-registration health profession students. However, further evidence is required to assess if positive responses to simulated IPL activities are sustained in practice and translate into improving patient outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 26%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,774,558
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#211
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,813
of 316,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.