↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Uterus transplantation: current progress and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Uterus transplantation: current progress and future prospects
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s75635
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liza Johannesson, Stina Järvholm

Abstract

Even if reproductive medicine has been remarkably successful during the past few decades, with the introduction of in vitro fertilization in the late 1970s and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the early 1990s, it has been repeatedly mocked by infertility due to an absolute uterine factor. No treatment has been available for the women suffering from an absent or dysfunctional uterus, in terms of carrying a pregnancy. Approximately one in 500 women suffer from absolute uterine infertility, and the option so far to become a mother has been to either adopt or utilize gestational surrogacy. As of today, a total of eleven cases of human uterus transplantations have been reported worldwide, conducted in three different countries. The results of these initial experimental cases far exceed what might be expected of a novel surgical method. Many more uterus transplantations are to be expected in the near future, as other research teams' preparations are being ready to be put into clinical practice. In this review, we summarize the current worldwide experience of uterus transplantation as a treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility and the future prospects of human uterus transplantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 29 26%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#898,406
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#62
of 896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,997
of 408,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them