↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for total knee replacement in elderly patients on the postoperative quality of recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for total knee replacement in elderly patients on the postoperative quality of recovery
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/cia.s56116
Pubmed ID
Authors

JunLe Liu, WeiXiu Yuan, XiaoLin Wang, Colin F Royse, MaoWei Gong, Ying Zhao, Hong Zhang

Abstract

Both peripheral nerve blocks with sedation or general anesthesia can be used for total knee replacement surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 10 8%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Psychology 12 9%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 41 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,165,207
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#542
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,927
of 322,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#8
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.