↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The role of microglia in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 3,131)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
Title
The role of microglia in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s140634
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun Luo, Chongdong Jian, Yuhan Liao, Qi Huang, Yuejuan Wu, Xixia Liu, Donghua Zou, Yuan Wu

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Microglia are the resident innate immune cells in the CNS; they play an important role in the processes of demyelination and remyelination in MS. Microglia can function as antigen-presenting cells and phagocytes. In the past, microglia were considered to be the same cell type as macrophages, and researchers have different opinions about the role of microglia in MS. This review focuses on the original classification of microglia and their role in the pathogenesis of MS. Moreover, we present a hypothetical model for the role of microglia in the pathogenesis of MS based on recent findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 380 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 86 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 15%
Student > Master 47 12%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 106 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 61 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 4%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 126 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#414,336
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#47
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,680
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.